enhesa

Flash Audit Protocols Country Profile Monitoring

home

2004 Global Forecast

2.  Climate change

Introduction

Executive summary

2002 regulatory review

       

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Chemicals restrictions

Climate change

 Safety at work

 Waste minimisation

 Emergency planning and response

Air quality

Use of water resources

Noise at work

Transparency

Management systems

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full 2004 Forecast 
(Pdf 2,075 KB)

 

 

Climate change

>> Introduction

>> Regulatory developments

>> Web links

 
 

Full report (Pdf 186 KB)

 
     
 

Introduction

 

 

International Context of Climate Change

In 2002, 56 countries (i.e. 25 from Annex I and 31 from Non-Annex I) have moved forward to handle climate change issues. Likely, 2003 or 2004 would be the year that the Kyoto Protocol enters into force (however, it is solely depending on Russia’s decision for the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol under the circumstance that U.S.A will not join the Protocol).

Status of the Climate Change Convention and the Kyoto Protocol

 

2002

Annex I

Non-Annex I

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Ratification

2

14

11

6

Austria, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, United Kingdom

Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mali, Papua New Guinea, Peru, South Korea, Seychelles, Thailand, Vietnam

Acceptance

 

1

 

 

Japan

 

Accession

6

2

8

3

Hungary, Iceland, Netherlands

Benin, Bhutan, Cambodia, Cameroon, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Grenada, India, Jordan, Lao, Liberia, Morocco, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Uganda, Tanzania, 

Approval

 

2

1

 

European Community, France

China

* 2002_Q4 includes January and February of 2003.

* Annex I countries have obligatory reduction targets under the Climate Change Convention and the Kyoto Protocol.

* An explanation of legal terms can be found on-line at: http://untreaty.un.org/English/guide.asp#glossary.

* The rules for entry into force of the Kyoto Protocol require 55 Parties to the Climate Change Convention to ratify (or approve, accept or accede to) the Protocol, including Annex I Parties accounting for 55% of that group’s carbon dioxide emissions in 1990.

Regional Context of Climate Change

In line with 2002 regulatory developments in European countries in which most of them have ratified the Kyoto Protocol in 2002 it is expected that there would be more active regulatory requirements such as emissions trading, CO2 tax/energy tax, climate change agreement, energy efficiency, etc.

As Canada has ratified the Kyoto Protocol in December 2002, it is estimated that there will be more regulatory approaches to climate change on the North American side. In U.S.A even though there might not be stringent requirements at the federal level on climate change, some of the states sets requirements on Greenhouse Gas emission reduction and reporting from industrial facilities and in the transportation sector.

Asia-Pacific and Latin American countries would not actively regulate industrial facilities with stringent requirements, as countries have no obligatory reduction targets under the Kyoto Protocol. Many countries in the region (e.g. Brazil, Chile, Mexico, South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, etc) respond to climate change issues with improving measures such as energy efficiency labeling, building standards, energy audits, energy efficiency standards, voluntary agreements, tax incentives, demand-side management in energy supply, fuel efficiency, etc.

Country-Specific and Industry-Specific Approach to Climate Change

Apart from the politics of climate change at the international level, regulatory developments on climate change at the national level have been and are being focused on energy use such as energy efficiency, building standards, renewable energy, and emission reporting.

1. Energy Efficiency

With respect to energy efficiency national energy labels and minimum energy performance standards are common measures taken by countries. Targeted products are varied country by country. Refrigerators, freezers and air conditioners are commonly regulated. Electric products are fast becoming targeted products.

Labeling Programs and Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS)

 

Program

C/E

M/V

Regulatory Information/Implementing Agency

Argentina

-

C

M

Resolution of May 1999 Household appliances labeling

Australia

Star Rating Scheme (Electric)

C

M

State and Territory Government, National Appliance and Equipment Energy Efficiency Committee and Standards Australia publish regulatory standards

Galaxy Energy Award

E

V

Initially a Victorian Program, becoming national

International Energy Star

E

V

US EPA and US DOE develop endorsement criteria

Mandatory MEPS

Air conditioner, freezers, motors, refrigerators, water heaters

Brazil

Programa Brasileiro de Etiquetagem-PBE

C

V

Programa Nacional de Conservacao de Energia Eletrica and National Institute of Metrology 

Stamp Procel de Economia de Energia

E

M

Programa Nacional de Conservacao de Energia Eletrica 

Canada

EnerGuide Program

C

M/V

Energy Efficiency Act

Environmental ChioceM Program/EcoLogo

E

V

Environment Canada

Mandatory MEPS

Air conditioner, ballasts, boilers, freezers, lamps, refrigerators, etc.

Chile

-

E

V

National Energy Commission is developing

Mandatory MEPS

Motors and refrigerators

China

-

E

V

The Law on Energy Conservation of China

Mandatory MEPS

Air conditioners-room, ballasts, irons, refrigerators, rice cookers, TV, etc.

European Union

Energy Label

C

M

National bodies of EU member countries

GEA Label

E

V

Group for Energy Efficient Appliances

European Eco-label award scheme

E

V

European Union Econ Labeling Board

Mandatory MEPS

Ballasts, Boilers, freezers, refrigerators, etc.

Hong Kong

Energy Label

C/E

V

Electrical and Mechanical Services Department

Japan

International Energy Star

E

V

-

Energy Saving Labeling System

C

M

The Law on the Rational Use of Energy/Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry

Top Runner standards program

Air conditioner, computers, lamps, copiers, refrigerators, freezers, TV, etc.

Korea

Energy Efficiency Rating Labeling Program

C

M

The Act on the Rational Use of Energy/Korea Energy Management Corporation (KEMCO)

Energy-saving office equipment & home electronics program

E

V

KEMCO

Mandatory MEPS

Air conditioners-room, ballasts, boilers, computers, lamps, refrigerators, etc.

Mexico

Eficencia Energetica

C

M

National Energy Savings Commission

Sello FIDE

E

V

FIDE Trust for saving Electrical Energy

Mandatory MEPS

Air conditioners, boilers, lamps, motors, refrigerator, transformers, etc.

Philippines

Philippine Appliance Energy Standards and Labeling Program

C

M

Department of Energy, Bureau of Product Standards and Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers

Mandatory MEPS

Air conditioners-room, fluorescent lamp ballast

Poland

Energy Label

C

M

The Energy Law of 1997

Polish Efficient Lighting Program/Efficient Lighting Initiative

E

V

International Finance Corporation

Mandatory MEPS

Clothes washers, refrigerators, space heaters

Russia

ENERGOCOMPASS

-

-

Center for Energy Efficiency

Mandatory MEPS

Air conditioners, audio, computers, freezers, monitors, printers, TV, etc.

Singapore

Green Labeling Scheme

E

V

Ministry of Environment

Mandatory MEPS

Air conditioners-room

Switzerland

Energy 2000

C

V

Swiss Federal Office of Energy

Taiwan

Greenmark

E

V

Environment and Development Foundation

International Energy Star

E

V

-

Mandatory MEPS

Air conditioners-room, ballasts, motors, refrigerators, rice cookers, etc.

Thailand

Energy Label 

E

V

The Energy Conservation Promotion Act of 1992/Electrictiy Generating Authority of Thailand

Green Labeling Scheme

E

V

Thailand Environment Institute

U.S.A

Energy Guide

C

M

The Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, the National Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1978, the Energy Policy Act/US Federal Trade Commission

Energy Star

E

V

The National Appliance Energy Conservation Act/Department of Energy (DOE), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

International Energy Star

E

V

DOE, EPA/International Partner-Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan, EU, Canada

Mandatory MEPS

Air conditioners, boilers, ballasts, freezer, motors, microwave, water heaters, clothes dryers/washers, dishwashers, furnace, etc.

* C: comparative label (mostly mandatory in OECD countries), E: endorsement label (mostly voluntary)

* M: mandatory, V: voluntary

Even though labeling programs are national or regional wide they are not strictly restricted within the country or region. European Union label, for instance, has been adopted by other countries such as Bulgaria, Iceland, Poland, etc and US Energy Star program also has been adopted by other international partner countries.

Examples of Energy Labels

U.S.A Energy Guide

U.S Energy Star

Japan Energy Saving Label

GEEA

EU Energy Label

Energy 2000

Swedish TCO

Energy Rating

Energy Smart

2. Building Standards

It is true that buildings have a large proportion in energy consumption of a country. For instance, it is estimated that buildings consume around 40% of overall energy consumption in EU.

Energy efficiency standards for dwellings and service sector building have been set up in most of OECD countries including European countries, Australia, Canada, U.S.A, Japan, Korea, etc. Some other countries (e.g. Singapore, Philippines, etc) establish mandatory or voluntary standards for service buildings.

It is expected that integration of renewable and micro-power systems into the building codes would be increased with making small buildings subject to more complex performance-based building codes.

Energy Efficiency Standards for Buildings

 

Dwellings
Buildings

Monitoring

Year

Status

Savings

Year

Status

Savings

 

Austria

1991/98

M

 

1991/98

M

 

۷

Belgium

2000

M

 

2000

M

 

۷

Portugal

1988

M

25 %

1988

M

25 %

۷

Germany

1995

M

30%

1995

M

30%

۷

Ireland

1991/97

M

30 %

1991/97

M

30 %

 

Italy

1994

M

10%

1994

M

10 %

۷

Netherlands

1995

M

 

1995

M

 

۷

2000

M

40%

2000

M

40%

۷

Spain

1998

M

 

1998

M

 

 

Sweden

1984

M

 

1984

M

 

 

UK

1995

 

15%

 

M

 

 

Czech Rep.

1983

M

 

1983

M

 

 

Hungary

 

 

 

1991

M

40%

 

Poland

1994

M

15-20%

1994

M

15-20%

 

Australia

1997

M

 

1997

M

 

۷

Canada

1982

V

20-50%

1997

V

 

۷

1997

V

 

 

 

 

 

Japan

1999

M

18%

1999

M

23%

 

Korea

1994

M

 

1994

M

   

Mexico

2001

P, M

 

2001

P, M

   

New Zealand

1999

M

 

1999

M

   

USA

1998

V, M

 

1998

V

 

۷

Chile

 

   

1999

M

 

 

Hong Kong,

 

   

1995

M

 

۷

India

 

   

2001

P

   

Indonesia

 

   

2000

V

   

Philippines

 

   

1994

M

   

Russia

1990

M

 

1990

M

   

Taiwan

 

 

 

1998

M

5-10%

 

M = mandatory; P = planned; Pr = proposed

Savings: consumption reduction compared to dwellings/buildings built before the enforcement of the standards

3. Greenhouse Gas Emission Reporting

In order to take appropriate measures for Greenhouse Gas emission reduction with the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol (and potential entry into force of the Protocol) at the national level basically it would require to set up a national emission inventory followed by accurate and timely emission reporting from the facility level.

There are the following existing examples of mandatory greenhouse gas reporting programs in the European Union and Ontario and of voluntary programs in Quebec, Canada, California and Australia.

Examples of Emission Reporting

 

Coverage of Facilities

Coverage of Gas

Competent Authorities

Legal Background

Ontario

Electrical generation, metal ore and non-metallic mineral mining, natural gas distribution, wood products, pulp and paper, petroleum refining, chemical manufacturing, iron and steel mills

CO2, CH4, N2O, CFCs, HFCs, HCFCs, SF6

Ministry of the Environment and Energy (National Pollutant Release Inventory)

Ontario Regulation 127/01 (Airborne Contaminant Discharge-Monitoring and Reporting)

European Union

Member States (individual facilities involved in energy industry, production and processing of metals, mineral industry, chemical industry, waste management, pulp and paper, textile, etc) 

CO2, CH4, N2O, CFCs, HFCs, PFCs, SF6

European Commission (European Pollutant Emission Register)

European Commission Decision 2000/479/EC

Quebec

Voluntary participants

GHGs

EcoGESte Registry Office (Canada’s Climate Change Voluntary Challenge and Registry Inc.)

Quebec’s 1995 Climate Change Action Plan

Canada

Voluntary participants

GHGs

Canada’s Climate Change Voluntary Challenge and Registry Inc.

-

California

Voluntary participants

CO2, CH4, N2O, CFCs, HFCs, PFCs, SF6

California Energy Commission (California Climate Action Registry)

-

Australia

Voluntary participants

CO2, CH4, N2O, CFCs, HFCs, PFCs, SF6

Australia Greenhouse Office

Greenhouse Challenge

From a practical point of view, the harmonization of Greenhouse Gas reporting practices is essential to measure and track progress on the reduction and fossil fuel usage at the corporate, national and international level. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol developed by the World Business Council on Sustainable Development and the World Resources Institute has been widely used, referred to by the following facilities and programs for Greenhouse Gas reporting:

Members of Climate Leaders Program of U.S EPA (e.g. BP, Cinergy, Ford, IBM, International Paper, PSEG, etc.);

California Climate Action Registry Protocol;

Chicago Climate Exchange;

The Wisconsin Voluntary Emission Reduction Registry;

WBCSD Working Group Cement CO2 Protocol;

NZBCSD’s Business Opportunities and Global Climate Change;

International Forum of Forest and Paper Associations Pulp and Paper Sector Tool;

World Wide Fund Climate Savers;

BLICC (Business Leaders Initiative on Climate Change);

French REGES Protocol;

New ISO Standard on GHG Accounting for Entity and Projects;

Italian Study for the Definition of Guidelines for Monitoring, Reporting and Verification of Greenhouse Gases.

Ratifying the Kyoto Protocol and facing coming entry into force of the Protocol, it is expected that emission reporting on voluntary or mandatory basis would be one of the common regulatory developments at the national level.

4. Using and Investing Renewable Energy: Renewable Portfolio Standards or Management?

With respect to climate change and energy issues, renewable energy has been receiving attention all over the world. As is shown below, combustible renewables and waste account for nearly 80% of the renewables share, hydro for 16.5% and "new" renewables: geothermal, solar, tidal, wave, wind and other, together account for 0.5% in 2000.

2000 Fuels Shares of World Total Primary Energy Supply

Source: IEA

Many of the governments sets minimum targets for electricity generation from renewable sources. Under the concept of renewable energy certificate system (or green certificate system) there has been discussion that requires electric utility have X percentage of the supply side generation from renewables or purchase a renewable energy allowance credit in Europe and U.S.A. Members of RECS (Renewable Energy Certificate System), for example, include facilities from the following countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium and Luxembourg, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, U.S.A.

Especially the following six States of U.S.A have adopted the renewable portfolio standards (RPS) by increasing the amount of renewable energy in the overall electric source portfolio: Maine, Nevada, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Texas.

5. Green House Gas (GHG) Emissions Trading

GHG emissions trading will take on greater importance in 2003, and not only in Europe.  Some fifty-six countries around the world are moving on a variety of initiatives to combat global climate change, including in many a variety of emissions trading schemes.  These trading initiatives vary by country according to the substances to be included, the participants and whether they will be compulsory or voluntary in approach.

For many industries, such schemes may offer the most cost-effective way of reducing their GHG emissions over the medium to longer term.  Although some trading schemes already exist, many are only in the pilot, or even planning, stages.  As more governments and markets gain experience and confidence in the schemes, it is very likely that they will spread to other countries as well.  At this stage, as new emission trading schemes are being planned and implemented, energy intensive industries are being strongly encouraged to participate in the various public consultations being sponsored by governments, in order to play a positive role in influencing the shape of the future trading schemes. The following table provides an overview of some of the emission trading schemes being discussed at the moment or already implemented.

 

EU

UK

F

DE - Hesse

DK 

SU

NL

NL

Coverage

CO2 only

Choice CO2 or all 6 GHG

All 6 GHG

CO2

CO2

All 6 GHG

NOx

CO2

Start

Planned

04/2002

Planned 2003

Pilot: 08/2000 – 05/2001

2001

2005 or later

2001

Planned 2004 - 2005

 

 

USA

CA – PERT

CN

JP

Coverage

SO2

All GHG & other pollutants

SO2

CO2

Start

Since 1994

Pilot: 1996

Pilot: 2003

Pilot: 2003

 

 
 

 

 
 

2002-2003 Regulatory Developments

The following is a list of regulatory developments related to Climate Change and Energy Efficiency that occurred in 2002 and the first half of 2003 in addition to those cited above.  The overview is taken from the EPC-Update.  The ID-number after each reference refers to the corresponding database record of the EPC-Update.  For more details on any of these developments one can subscribe to the “EPC-Update” which provides an abstract of each development.  A more detailed two-page summary and analysis of each initiative is also available via this service.

Countries/ID-Number in Enhesa Database

Climate Change General: AUSTRALIA [3762, 5280], AUSTRIA [5187, 4518], CANADA [Quebec-5415, 5176, 5533], COSTA RICA [5645], CZECH REPUBLIC [5495, 5489, 5483], DENMARK [5317], EUROPEAN UNION [5382, 5171, 3674], FRANCE [5451, 4850], GERMANY [5541, 5159, 2406, 5113, 4999, 4982, HUNGARY [5022], INDIA [5476, 2261], ITLAY [2104], JAPAN [5308], MEXICO [5537], PHILIPPINES [5004], SINGAPORE [5426], SPAIN [5579], UNITED KINGDOM [4097, 5583, 4281], UNITED STATES [5616]

Energy Efficiency Standards and MEPS: BRAZIL [5584], EUROPEAN UNION [5146, 5144, 4969], FINLAND [5597], GERMANY [4758, 5527, 5526, 1235], ITALY [5119, 4977], MALAYSIA [2248], MEXICO [5424], SPAIN [5446]

Building Standards: DENMARK [5390], EUROPEAN UNION [4432], ITALY [2625, 5124], MEXICO [3895], SPAIN [2317], UNITED KINGDOM [3975]

Emission Reporting: FRANCE [5465], UNITED STATES [4992]

Renewable Energy: UNITED KINGDOM [4632]

Emissions Trading: CANADA [5533], INDIA [5476], UNITED KINGOM [5583], EU [3207], TAIWAN [3832], FRANCE [4850]

 
     
 

Web links

The quantity of interesting information that is being made available on internet is growing every day. For the EHS Professional internet has become an important tool for finding more information on the issues of concern. The following overview of interesting websites is not intended to be exhaustive. It is however intended to point at some of the more interesting websites on Climate Change and Energy Efficiency.

UN Climate Change Site

http://unfccc.int/index.html

United Nations web-site on the Framework Convention on Climate Change with access to all official documents available in electronic format, essential information on the status of each Party's participation in the Convention, greenhouse gas inventory data (if available), etc.

World Energy Council

http://www.worldenergy.org

The World Energy Council is the foremost global multi-energy organization in the world. WEC has Member Committees in over 90 countries, including most of the largest energy-producing and energy consuming countries.

European Commission Climate Change Web-site

http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/climat/home_en.htm

Web-site of the European Commission DG Environment on climate change issues with access to all EU documents related to the Climate Change Conferences, information on the proposed EU emissions trading scheme, etc.

Energy Star Programme

http://www.energystar.gov/

The Energy Star Programme was introduced by the US Environmental Protection Agency in 1992 as a voluntary labeling program designed to identify and promote energy-efficient products, in order to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Since then, it has expanded to cover new homes, most of the buildings sector, residential heating and cooling equipment, major appliances, office equipment, lighting, consumer electronics, etc.

Renewable Energy Certificate System (RECS)

http://www.recs.org

RECS provides a mechanism for representing a specific instance of the production of a megawatt hour of renewable electricity by a unique certificate. RECS members have developed and adopted a set of rules to ensure that national systems are harmonized, built to the same standards and compatible with each other.

World Business Council for Sustainable Development

http://www.wbcsd.org/

The World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) is a coalition of 165 international companies united by a shared commitment to sustainable development via the three pillars of economic growth, ecological balance and social progress.

The International Climate Change Partnership (ICCP)

http://www.iccp.net

ICCP is a global coalition of companies and trade associations from diverse industries committed to constructive and responsible participation in the international policy process concerning global climate change. The ICCP recognizes that the continued growth in emissions of greenhouse gases is an important concern for all nations and that efforts are underway internationally and in national governments to develop policies that address this concern.

The Global Environmental Management Initiative (GEMI)

 http://www.businessandclimate.org/

GEMI is a nonprofit organization of leading companies dedicated to fostering environmental, health and safety excellence worldwide through the sharing of tools and information in order for business to help business achieve environmental excellence.

 
     
 

previous <<<   >>> next

 
     
 

For further Information:

 

 

To be kept updated of the EHS regulatory changes impacting industry worldwide, one can take a free subscription to the EPC-Flash at http://www.enhesa.com/EN_version/newsletter.htm

For an interview or further information please contact:
WASHINGTON DC: Mr Paul BEATLEY, Tel +1-301-530.13.92
BRUSSELS: Mr Thierry DUMORTIER, Tel +32-2-775.97.97

NOTE: both the Executive Summary and the study may be reproduced in part or in whole, provided credit is given to "ENHESA – Environmental Policy Centre", the web-site  www.enhesa.com is mentioned and a copy is emailed or sent to ENHESA.

 

 

 

 

Enhesa Environmental Policy Centre

Brussels: 15 rue du Mail, 1050 Brussels, Belgium, Tel: +32 (0)2-775.97.97, Fax: +32 (0)2-775.97.99, E-mail: enhesa@enhesa.com

Washington: 4320 Clearbrook Lane, Kensington, Maryland 20895, USA, Tel: +1-301-530-13-92 Fax: +1-301-530-13-92, Email: pcb@enhesa.com

Tokyo

Florence

Last modified on 10 November 2009